All Open Letters
UN Ban on Nuclear Weapons Open Letter
Nuclear arms are the only weapons of mass destruction not yet prohibited by an international convention, even though they are the most destructive and indiscriminate weapons ever created. We scientists bear a special responsibility for nuclear weapons, since it was scientists who invented them and discovered that their effects are even more horrific than first thought.
19 June, 2018
An Open Letter from Scientists in Support of the UN Nuclear Weapons Negotiations
Click here to see this page in other languages : Russian
Nuclear arms are the only weapons of mass destruction not yet prohibited by an international convention, even though they are the most destructive and indiscriminate weapons ever created. We scientists bear a special responsibility for nuclear weapons, since it was scientists who invented them and discovered that their effects are even more horrific than first thought. Individual explosions can obliterate cities, radioactive fallout can contaminate regions, and a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse may cause mayhem by frying electrical grids and electronics across a continent. The most horrible hazard is a nuclear-induced winter, in which the fires and smoke from as few as a thousand detonations might darken the atmosphere enough to trigger a global mini ice age with year-round winter-like conditions. This could cause a complete collapse of the global food system and apocalyptic unrest, potentially killing most people on Earth – even if the nuclear war involved only a small fraction of the roughly 14,000 nuclear weapons that today’s nine nuclear powers control. As Ronald Reagan said: “A nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.”
Unfortunately, such a war is more likely than one may hope, because it can start by mistake, miscalculation or terrorist provocation. There is a steady stream of accidents and false alarms that could trigger all-out war, and relying on never-ending luck is not a sustainable strategy. Many nuclear powers have larger nuclear arsenals than needed for deterrence, yet prioritize making them more lethal over reducing them and the risk that they get used.
But there is also cause for optimism. On March 27 2017, an unprecedented process begins at the United Nations: most of the world’s nations convene to negotiate a ban on nuclear arms, to stigmatize them like biological and chemical weapons, with the ultimate goal of a world free of these weapons of mass destruction. We support this, and urge our national governments to do the same, because nuclear weapons threaten not merely those who have them, but all people on Earth.
If you have questions about this letter, please contact Max Tegmark.
Sources
* 1979 report by the US Government estimating that nuclear war would kill 28%-88% without including nuclear winter effects
* Electromagnetic pulse: p79 of US Army Report AD-A278230 (unclassified)
* Peer-reviewed 2007 nuclear winter calculation
* Estimate of current nuclear warhead inventory from Federation of American Scientists
* Timeline of nuclear close calls
* UN General Assembly Resolution to launch the above-mentioned negotiations
Signatories
To date, this letter has been signed by scientists (this does not imply endorsement by their organizations):
You need javascript enabled to view the letter signers.
Close
How does verification work?
Verified signatures are those which we have taken one or more extra steps to confirm as legitimate:
• Direct contact - We have been in direct contact with this person to verify that they have signed the letter.
• Declaration URL - This person has made a public declaration of signing the open letter which can be viewed online.
• Declaration URL - This person has made a public declaration of signing the open letter which can be viewed online.
All published signatures, ‘verified’ or otherwise, are subject to several forms of verification: email verification, spam and duplicate filters, and a review by a member of our data vetting team.
OPEN LETTERS
Related posts
If you enjoyed this, you also might like:
2672
Open letter calling on world leaders to show long-view leadership on existential threats
The Elders, Future of Life Institute and a diverse range of co-signatories call on decision-makers to urgently address the ongoing impact and escalating risks of the climate crisis, pandemics, nuclear weapons, and ungoverned AI.
14 February, 2024
Closed
AI Licensing for a Better Future: On Addressing Both Present Harms and Emerging Threats
This joint open letter by Encode Justice and the Future of Life Institute calls for the implementation of three concrete US policies in order to address current and future harms of AI.
25 October, 2023
31810
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
We call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
22 March, 2023
998
Open Letter Against Reckless Nuclear Escalation and Use
The abhorrent Ukraine war has the potential to escalate into an all-out NATO-Russia nuclear conflict that would be the greatest catastrophe in human history. More must be done to prevent such escalation.
18 October, 2022